Title: Lateral Reading with Critical Source Analysis
Description: This is the second of the two-part tutorial series Evaluating Online Sources. Building on the first tutorial, this resource brings together lateral reading strategies and closer source analysis.
Prerequisite: Completion of tutorial Evaluating Online Sources through Lateral Reading: An Introduction
Audience: Anyone interested in strengthening their fact-checking and online source evaluation skills
Purpose: Developing skills in deeper source analysis by using lateral reading in combination with critical questions.
Review the concept of lateral reading, including the related strategies of click restraint and SIFT.
Apply the evaluative questions what, who, why, and how to closer source analysis of a website.
Reflect on how your source evaluation process during this tutorial can be applied to your everyday and academic life.
Suggested time: 30-40 minutes
Suggestions for proceeding with module: To protect your device from malware, do not click on links that look suspicious, and do not download files that you do not recognize!
Suggested search engine: Google
Andrea Baer is a Public Services Librarian at Rowan University Libraries. She has been an academic librarian for 10 years. Prior to becoming a librarian Andrea taught literature, languages, and writing in various educational settings, including higher education. Her research and writing focuses on information literacy and reflective teaching practice.
Dan Kipnis is the Life Sciences Librarian at Rowan University Libraries. He has worked as an academic librarian for 20 years and has published on a variety of topics including digital archives and information literacy.
This guide was created by Andrea Baer and Dan Kipnis at Rowan University and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC-SA).
Thank you for your interest in this tutorial series, which consists of:
The first tutorial introduces the practice of "lateral reading," an approach to source evaluation that begins with spending little time on the website in question and instead leaving the site to see what others say about the source or related issue. The second tutorial, building on the first, offers further guidance on posing critical questions about a source while engaging in lateral reading. Both tutorials offer opportunities for practice and feedback. Below is additional information that may be useful for classes that complete the tutorials.
We, the tutorial creators (Andrea and Dan), are collecting participants’ responses to the tutorial activities in order to assess the tutorials’ effectiveness in teaching about online source evaluation. This research has been approved by Rowan University’s IRB Office - Protocol PRO-2020-225. Any individual 18 years of age or older can complete the tutorial, regardless of whether they choose to participate in the study. At the beginning of each tutorial’s first activity, the respondent is asked if they agree to have their responses included in the study analysis and in research about the tutorial. The PIs also clarify that if individuals choose not to participate in the study, they can still complete the tutorial and their responses will not be included in the analysis. If participants agree to complete either tutorial, they are asked to share their email address, organization/school, course name, course instructor, and course number.
Both tutorials have two parts:
Part 2: Once participants have submitted their evaluation exercise, they receive information on how to access Part 2 of the given tutorial. In Part 2 of each tutorial, they receive feedback on their evaluation exercise and do a Post-Activity Reflection. We also wrap up with final points to remember.
If you would like for your students to show proof of tutorial completion, they will receive a message of completion at the very end of the tutorial. They can save this certificate as a PDF or a screenshot and can share it with you. We include instructions at the end of each tutorial’s last activity about how to save this proof of completion.
We’d appreciate any feedback that you or your students have about the tutorial and your experiences with it. Please let us know if you have any questions, and thanks again for your interest!
Andrea and Dan
Andrea Baer, History and Political Science Librarian (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Dan Kipnis, Life Sciences Librarian (email@example.com)