Our identities and life experiences powerfully influence our perceptions of the world and beliefs about it. They also affect what information we encounter online and how we think about that information. The recommended resources for March’s FLC meeting explore the intersections between identity, belief, and information behaviors, including topics like confirmation bias, belief change and motivational interviewing, and the relationship between one’s social positioning and perspective on various social issues.
Discussion Topics:
Suggested related readings, teaching activities, or teaching strategies
Resources:
Video: “Why Do Our Brains Love Fake News?” Above the Noise, KQED (5 mins: 20 sec)
Additional resources:
Podcast: (60 minutes) Being Well Podcast: How to Have Hard Conversations with Celeste Headlee
False balance/false equivalence/”bothsideness,” in which different perspectives/arguments on an issue are given equal attention despite that one “side” is not well supported by the evidence
Difficulty of having conversations about contentious/politicized issues without time for establishing deeper context and engaging in deeper discussion
How people interpret information differently
Practices that encourage or discourage dialogue and consideration of other perspectives
The important of context, including recognition of systems of power and privilege and the histories behind them
Appreciating how our social identities and life experiences influence our perspectives and responses to information, while also recognizing the role systems of power and privilege in our positionalities and not fostering an absolute relativism that is racist or violent to marginalized members of a class community
Watch and discuss political campaign ads from different political positions. Identify ways that each is strategic/manipulative. Showing a more egregious example first may help prepare students to look at other ads more critically.
Select a controversial topic and seek students who support the topic and also select students who don’t support the topic and ask them to switch their beliefs and to convince the student to see their viewpoint
The 6 hour experiment: Ask students to not use screens for 6 hours to see how this experiment influences how they navigate the world of information.
“Big Paper: Building a Silent Conversation” (Facing History) - uses writing, silence, and listening to help students explore a topic and different perspectives on it
"ACT UP for Evaluating Sources. Pushing Against Privilege": An approach to source evaluation that includes consideration of social privilege, perspective, and biases
Cranky Uncle game for learning to identify misinformation (can create student teams that compete)
Video Eli Pariser’s 2011 Filter Bubble TED Talk (8:48)
Video “Can You Trust Mainstream Media” (Hank Green) (3:43)
Video “Check Yourself with Lateral Reading” video (John Green) (13:52)
“Calling Bullsh*t” course (University of Washington)
Teaching Resources from Facing History - activities for fostering literacy and critical thinking skills in an inclusive class environment
Podcast/WNYC radio show On the Media, including the “No Silver Bullets” episode on de-radicalization strategies
“I Don’t Want to Be Right,” New Yorker
Studies have demonstrated that reliable facts alone don't often dissuade people from accepting false narratives, and that identity is a key factor in why. This article illustrates that even reliable facts are not rhetorically neutral, and that fighting the spread of mis/disinformation requires additional rhetorical skills.
Video “This Is a Generic Presidential Campaign Ad, by Dissolve” (3:32)
This generic, prescriptive example of a campaign ad may help students to understand the conventions of the political ad genre. Recognizing genre conventions will help students to more thoughtfully analyze the ads.