Assessment of student learning:
- How do we know that what we are teaching is working?
- Are we, as educators who are struggling to contend with the constantly moving goal posts of this problem falling back on ineffective strategies and materials and search engine optimization?
Information access and the digital divide:
- Access to resources and frustration with paywalls
- The privileging of certain voices (e.g., academic sources) and the marginalization of others (e.g., indigenous knowledge, personal experience), and the continued need for a greater diversity of voices
- The false dichotomy of “good” and “bad” sources (which is often synonymous with “scholarly” and “unscholarly” sources)
- The value of learning to do Internet research and to critically evaluate online sources, activities that will continue to be essential outside of academic settings and in everyday life
The complexity of teaching about bias
- Almost all sources have implicit or unconscious biases. No source is perfect.
- Many students are under the assumption that, because no sources are perfect and humans have implicit or unconscious biases, every source must be corrupt and no sources are entirely trustworthy. This can lead to setbacks in their understanding of research.
Distinguishing sources:
Students often have a difficult time distinguishing between legitimate news sources and propaganda sites.